I agree that Opus should show an error message in situations like this. It's annoying that it doesn't at the moment.
That said, I think the zip file itself is either non-standard/corrupt or uses some new part of Zip (like AES encryption or something) that not many things work with.
If I try to extract it with IZArc I get a zero byte file, and no error message.
If I try to extract if with WinRAR I get no files extracted and two error messages:
[quote="WinRAR"]! NoUnzipWithDOpus8225.zip: Unknown method in stuzza-handbuch.pdf
! NoUnzipWithDOpus8225.zip: No files to extract
[/quote]
I can't remember with which tool I've zipped it but I think it was a lower version of SpeedCommander 11 - btw - the unzip with SpeedCommander 11 works (http://www.speedproject.de/).
But as you can see TotalCommander 6.55 works too - I don't know what TC supports but I know I didn't do something special - maybe the default settings ...
I've just found the file and I've thought I give an example file. Please download it - I don't know how long the file will be on my server
PS: If you need the original .pdf please let me know.
WinZip can't extract the file either but does report some useful information:
[quote="WinZip"]Extracting to "Temp\wz17c7"
Use Path: yes Overlay Files: yes
skipping: stuzza-handbuch.pdf this file is not in the standard Zip 2.0 format.
Please see www.winzip.com/zip2.htm for more information.
Version needed value for this file is 51.
Compression method value is 12.
error: no files were found - nothing to do[/quote]
I looked up compression method 12:
[quote="Wikipedia"]Bzip2 (method 12)
This method uses the well-known bzip2 algorithm. This algorithm performs better than deflate but is not widely supported, particularly by Windows-based tools.[/quote]
Seems silly that there are programs out there using that compression method. The good thing about Zip is that everyone can unpack it but that's lost when using a method that almost no Windows programs/libraries support. Might as well use a better compression system if compatibility isn't the aim.
Whether Opus can support this compression method probably depends on the company who make the Zip library Opus licences.
[quote="nudel"]
Seems silly that there are programs out there using that compression method. The good thing about Zip is that everyone can unpack it but that's lost when using a method that almost no Windows programs/libraries support. Might as well use a better compression system if compatibility isn't the aim.[/quote]
It's even more silly that they name the file ".zip" when it's a ".bz2", isn't it? It's like "lets make a better version of gif, lets use the same internal format as png instead, but we'll still call the files .gif so nobody will notice the difference!"
Don't give away the secret about my 32bit transparent lossless jpeg images! Ack! Now I need to create a new format... 32bit transparent lossless animated jpegs!