I've been brainstorming the best possible system for assimilating, storing, and finding digital information on Windows 10. Especially for project management, and Digital Asset Management (DAM).
Researched all the possible apps I could find and tried out a couple.
What I like is metadata, because when the file gets moved, its searchable information goes with it. And anything that can read metadata is compatible with this information. (The reason I stick with Windows is compatibility).
So I've thought up of a systematic metadata tag system for all my digital assets; with the intent that this same system serve me for the rest of my life, assuming it's rock solid, and a better one never comes along, so that the time investment to build it is invested in once only. It's meant to save time, not spend it, although it's just a passion project right now.
- Seven strict categories. They are ordered from most relevant to least relevant, so search filters will populate lists by relevance, top to bottom. The categories stay in the same spots.
- Always three letters, always uppercase, for consistency. Always yellow, but I would like categories to have their own colours.
- Each category has a choice of tag. Every file will have all seven tags.
- Tag alphabetical order doesn't matter, only relevance.
- They can be searched by 1 - all 7 tags, or combinations of tags. And by filtering (hiding) unwanted files by tag.
- In searches and filtering, will be mixed with the other file data, like age, rating, etc.
- The point of custom tags is to build a system that works with my personal logic.
...
I would love for Dopus and the third party scripts to be equipped for this task, but they are not.
Why?
-Metadata needs to be enabled to be accessed, instead of always being readily available. (Tags are all inside one little box, within a bunch of other metadata that often just gets in the way. Or you have to trigger a script in order to use it. Or the metadata pane isn't currently open.)
-Tags have to be typed instead of being buttons that can be clicked (toggled on/off).
-Typing needs the manual semi-colon and space between tags.
-There are no tag colours or grouping.
-Tags can't be kept in their column (my personal categories that I want to keep)
-The tags column can only filter by whatever order the tags are in.
-Saved searches don't have clickable buttons to enable/disable tags, and you have to type out proper syntax instead of a guided GUI, putting the tags in AND / OR / HIDE groups.
-Saved searches are good, and the search boxes, but I have to manually type out changes to my search, like buttons and drop down lists were never invented. (What are computer programmer's obsession with command prompts?)
-There is no automatic tagging. I would want a project tag to be added to a file when put in a particular folder. And a "picture" tag to be added to all picture files etc.
-There is no automatic changing of tags. I can't click on a button anywhere to declare items in a folder as "finished" etc. , and the system would remove the "work in progress" tags and add "finished" tags, then ask if I'm monitoring this project or not, and change that tag. (etc.)
-No "add metadata" system. You select your file/s then trigger this dialog, then choose what tags get added to the files. As in: each category gets one choice only and you go through and click on the buttons, choosing your tags. like it's an all you can eat buffet, then accept.
-New files would always trigger this dialogue.
So right now I'm leaning toward keeping my system in Dopus (I have to rebuild all my tags) and going back to using Eagle for project management. I don't like having two tag systems, but this is what I got to work with. I'll let you know how I get on with it.
I like how the Dopus forum has a mature, clickable tag system, that actually resembles...tags:
But not in the software that the forum WAS BUILT TO MANAGE
That's computer programmers for ya.
They are going to be the death of us all.
Hey, did you know markdown is markup, and you use plain text to make plain text not plain text.